4 ms·
If your employer had an option available which could significantly reduce your risk of dying on the job, what would you prefer that they prioritise above taking
by afarrell 7y ago
If your employer had an option available which could significantly reduce your risk of dying on the job, what would you prefer that they prioritise above taking that option?
A) The lives of bystanders
B) The property of bystanders
C) The cost of equipment
D) The aesthetics of equipment
Personally, say:
- Definitely A.
- B & C at some point if the cost/risk is above a certain amount...but what is that number?
- Never D.
- squarefoot 7y agoI agree with the use of force since the robber was armed, but in the end refusing any compensation is an awful choice that also sends the wrong message: next time make an attempt to trade with the robber but don't call the police.
- mannykannot 7y agoIt is preposterous to suggest that every other option would have created more risk for the police. The issue here is not one of giving the police protection, it is one of misuse (to put it mildly) of the equipment intended for that purpose.
- BubRoss 7y agoAre they going to be held responsible for destroying the property?