3 ms·
So we are litearaly at square 0 still here?
by zzzcarrot 7y ago
So we are litearaly at square 0 still here?
- chrisacky 7y agoNo, sounds like we've eliminated 70 years worth of other possible squares.. if you want to take glass half full approach.
- yourapostasy 7y agoSimilar to the realization that saying "no" is one of life's important skills to internalize. Closing off possible avenues of explanation is just as much of an advancement as finding evidence to support an explanation.
- poelzi 7y agoPhysics took 2 wrong roads and it got stuck in a local minima of the truth plane. Understanding that physics is the most ignorant field of science and how proud the field is of it's models, I don't think this will come anytime soon. https://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7426 https://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7426 PS: you need to understand how gravity is derived to manipulate it's propagation. Since the mechanisms are very stable due various reasons, only a very good understanding of many processes will allow you to design an experiment that works. I have adopted a very fringe physics model that is unified and explains more using less assumptions. From this perspective I can tell you that contemporary physics is so far from understanding, that most likely we will not see anything in this direction, before we fully trashed our planet.
- conscion 7y agoWhat's your physics model?
- poelzi 7y agoThis one: https://www.amazon.de/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitation-Unified/dp/1412083877 https://www.amazon.de/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitati... Never could have come up with such a brilliant theory, took me a year to understand it. Now I understand 137 ^^