4 ms·
One would assume that if the damaged caused by the police was justifiable, then the responsibility for damage compensation lies with the criminal suspect in the
by DaiPlusPlus 7y ago
One would assume that if the damaged caused by the police was justifiable, then the responsibility for damage compensation lies with the criminal suspect in the case - and if they're unable to compensate the homeowner then the remainder should come from the municipality or state's general victims' fund. Does Denver or CO have such a fund?
- 100100010001 7y agoI wouldn’t qualify using military grade equipment in Colorado for stealing two belts and a shirt justifiable.
- topkai22 7y agoIt wasn't for a belt and two shirts, it was for attempted murder of police officers. Yes, the interaction might have started with simple shoplifting, but the suspect began firing at police officers. The home was destroyed after a 19 hour stand off with a intoxicated subject who continued to take meth throughout the standoff, during which the suspect continued to fire at police, and after which the suspect was apprehended alive. I'm trying to think of a more justifiable use of force outside of a hostage situation, but I'm having trouble thinking of one. See https://kdvr.com/2015/06/08/greenwood-village-police-standoff-suspect-tried-to-kill-them/ https://kdvr.com/2015/06/08/greenwood-village-police-standof... for a bit more background.
- nulbyte 7y agoJustification of an act does not relieve one from its consequences.