3 ms·

You guys are disagreeing on facts, or at least entering muddy territory. > The prosecutor said he was forced out for leading a corruption probe into Hunter Bid

• CraigJPerry 7y ago
  “The prosecutor said” something. It’s entirely fair to report what the prosecutor said provided it’s clearly attributed as it was here. You’re free to draw your own conclusion that the prosecutor is possibly lying.
• sjy 7y ago
  In addition to the point made by the sibling comment, these facts are consistent with an attack on Joe Biden for having an apparent conflict of interest, even if there was no evidence that he intentionally, corruptly used his power to benefit his son. (If he did, would you expect there to be any evidence?) Ethical public officials are expected to avoid apparent conflicts of interest.
• jeegsy 7y ago
  This is a perfect example of something I have been thinking about. Facts are funny things: Consider that if the media was pro-Trump for example, they would have omitted the "But there is no evidence" part. The opposite is also true. Since the media is nominally anti-trump, they must sway the story by including the no evidence part