> The Web existed before them, the Web will exist after them. That's a bit more black and white that my view. I don't care if the web "exists" per se, I don't

> The Web existed before them, the Web will exist after them. That's a bit more black and white that my view. I don't care if the web "exists" per se, I don't think I'd use if very much if it was still like it was in 1995. >I don't think ad-block users are sensitive to changes in ad speed, that they wouldn't be able to notice in the first place on account of using an ad-blocker. Wait, so you are only considering in the equation people who are currently already using ad blockers? Ummm, ok. It seems weird that I have to say this, but I think the idea is that every person who uses an ad blocker was once a person who didn't use an ad blocker, and that there is some threshold of annoyance that must be surpassed before they typically install an ad blocker. I don't think Google's attempt to speed up ads is intended to improve the experience for those who are already using ad blockers. Is this not obvious, or am I missing something?