>It's still a weird pivot for Deadspin to take, because that was never what they were about or where their audience was. I have been a Deadspin reader since at

>It's still a weird pivot for Deadspin to take, because that was never what they were about or where their audience was. I have been a Deadspin reader since at least 2006. It might have gotten more political over recent years (hasn't everything?), but I think you fundamentally didn't understand Deadspin's purpose if you think it was the place to go to read about David Price's fastball. There are countless places on the internet that cover stories like that better. The thing the separated Deadspin from the crowd was that they didn't stick to what happened on the field in sports and that was a key factor in them building their audience.