> The problem with degrees of truth is that they aren't composable into an argument. I can chain together a handful of things that are 99% true and arrive at an

> The problem with degrees of truth is that they aren't composable into an argument. I can chain together a handful of things that are 99% true and arrive at an absurd conclusion because the 1% is the interesting bit. For a general view: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Probabilistic_logic https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Probabilistic_logic Bayesian side: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/A_priori_probability https://www.wikiwand.com/en/A_priori_probability https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Bayesian_inference https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Bayesian_inference (Bayesian Updating)