Much of this article discusses the content of the books. The majority in the top section is pretty neutral. Then the final 3 or 4 paragraphs does some token dis

Much of this article discusses the content of the books. The majority in the top section is pretty neutral. Then the final 3 or 4 paragraphs does some token disagreement that I feel really should be discussed more, particularly as I may (likely) side with the book author rather than the conservative post author here.