Is this machine-generated text? That or it's badly translated. Either way, it's strangely incoherent and subtly flawed. Take just the first section. It talks a

Is this machine-generated text? That or it's badly translated. Either way, it's strangely incoherent and subtly flawed. Take just the first section. It talks about a bubble sort of ints. Then provides code for bubble sorting strings [1]. Then talks about "sign position in the ASCII table". "linking to the native sort function" is... not the right term (what happened to "call"?). And then we suddenly talk about "the element to be found" (weren't we just sorting?). The rest of the article is in the same vein. I hope I'm not coming across as just picking on someone's English skills - even with perfect English I would find it hard to follow the train of thought. [1] This is subtly different because (naive) string comparison is not constant-time, unlike comparing ints in most languages. I was half expecting the article to go there but it didn't. PS: If not for the discussion here, I would've skipped the read because the site has no HTTPS. Please get a cert, it's free: https://letsencrypt.org/ https://letsencrypt.org/