3 ms·

What you basically said is that women > men - [physical advantages, reproductive necessities]. You didn't explain why.

• uoaei 7y ago
  Women, collectively (at least in the sphere of the "public conversation"), are growing increasingly tired of dealing with men and their idiosyncracies. Or rather, they are realizing there are alternatives to silently accepting the errant behavioral traits. No one is making an absolute value claim of the two genders, so your comment is at best begging a divisive question that isn't relevant here.
  • rpiguy 7y ago
    Your assertion is extremely divisive. It implies female behavior is the norm (men and their idiosyncrasies) and that male behavior is errant. Women have plenty of idiosyncrasies and errant behavior, too.
    • uoaei 7y ago
      Whataboutism already? No one is challenging your claim either. Women are capable of making subjective value judgments and many who are willing to talk about it are demonstrating them.
      • rpiguy 7y ago
        Whataboutism would imply I was trying to refute your value judgement. I was pointing out how divisive they are.
      • permatech 7y ago
        Buzzword bingo already? Why not though "gaslighting" in there with your "whataboutism" claim?
  • shortandsweet 7y ago
    You could swap the two and your words still holds true. It means nothing. There is no substance to what you said. There's even some group, Maga I think it is, there is no equivalent for women. Who's getting sick of who? All I see is individuals being more choosey. People ghost both ways now a day. No gender does it more than the other.