> This must be sarcasm. Yeah, they reject violent action at the same time that explicitly provide all the necessary logistic support for violent action, like te

> This must be sarcasm. Yeah, they reject violent action at the same time that explicitly provide all the necessary logistic support for violent action, like telling people where is the police in real time, (the same policemen and policewomen that are ambushed later) THAT might be sarcasm. There is no terrorism or violence implicit in informing people of police location in real time. > they also slowly introduce and train naive youngsters in the exciting world of crime and urban war That is false. > send people to burn the streets, lose their eyes. That is also false. The second part is quite disturbing, putting the blame where it should not be. > and (with a little luck) die for the cause and create the long desired martyrs that will come some day That's disgusting.