4 ms·
That's a weak argument. One conspiracy theory was proven false so they must all be false? Does that apply to scientific studies, too?
by ScottFree 7y ago
That's a weak argument. One conspiracy theory was proven false so they must all be false? Does that apply to scientific studies, too?
- paulcole 7y agoPardon the bluntness, but your argument is equally weak. > Whenever I hear an overwhelming chorus of "that's conspiracy theory!" what I hear is "don't look too closely! You might find something!"
- ScottFree 7y agoThat's not an argument. My argument was the preceding statement. Maybe you should work on identifying what is and is not an argument before attempting to formulate your own.
- paulcole 7y agoHow was my comment even an argument? More of an observation that you likely have a theory you don’t stand behind except when it validates your existing beliefs.