3 ms·
The court acknowledged that this may seem “unfair,” but when police have to protect the public, they can’t be “burdened with the condition” that they compensate
by alfromspace 7y ago
The court acknowledged that this may seem “unfair,” but when police have to protect the public, they can’t be “burdened with the condition” that they compensate whoever is damaged by their actions along the way.
Incredible. A stranger can barricade themselves inside your property, the police can blow your property to bits trying to get to the stranger, and the owner of the property is on the hook.
The court's ruling that the Takings Clause doesn't apply because it's not an exercise of eminent domain is utter nonsense. There's no such requirement in the 5th Amendment that the government needs to label their use of private property "eminent domain" to be responsible for compensation for it. All it says is "public use". If this ruling is allowed to stand, this isn't America anymore.
- failrate 7y agoExactly, they eminent domained the dhit out of that house in pursuit of the criminal.
- Ididntdothis 7y agoI am not in a position to judge the tactics they used but it’s hard to understand how the government could refuse to compensate the homeowner who had nothing to do with this and had no choice.
- icebraining 7y agoTheir position seems to be that they don't need to compensate because he's already getting paid by the insurance company.