3 ms·
Probably not, because it is not an "accident". My dwelling policy actually says: We insure for accidental direct physical loss to the property Interestingly,
by tantalor 7y ago
Probably not, because it is not an "accident".
My dwelling policy actually says: We insure for accidental direct physical loss to the property
Interestingly, the article describes the incident as "a quasi-war zone" which is specifically not covered: We do not insure under any coverage for any loss which would not have occurred in the absence of one or more of the following excluded events: e. War, including any undeclared war, civil war, insurrection, rebellion, revolution, warlike act by a military force or military personnel, destruction or seizure or use for a military purpose, and including any consequence of any of these. Discharge of a nuclear weapon shall be deemed a warlike act even if accidental.
- johnnyo 7y agohttps://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/06/10/owner-of-home-destroyed-during-standoff-fuming-about-citys-compensation-offer/ https://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/06/10/owner-of-home-destroy... This article says that homeowner's was going to pay to rebuild, he wanted the city to pay for a longer term housing in the meantime while it was rebuilt. So, its unclear what he is suing for exactly, except maybe some temporary living expenses.