3 ms·
> it's not a language that can be everything to everyone. Unlike say, for example...?
by cookie_monsta 7y ago
> it's not a language that can be everything to everyone.
Unlike say, for example...?
- jgwil2 7y agoI'll probably get shit on for saying this, but JS comes closer. It's multi-paradigm, performant, and TS provides static type checking for those that want it. Of course, JS is also a language that gets excoriated for being poorly designed, so maybe intuitive design and adaptability are fundamentally at odds with each other.
- FpUser 7y agoNothing can be "everything to everyone". People are different. No point in trying to conquer the world.
- cookie_monsta 7y agoMy point exactly. It's unfair to criticise a language on the grounds that it doesn't do what no other language does.