4 ms·
If OTA didn't solve the problem at hand, the solution might be to improve it, rather than abolish it. One does not need to have more expertise to come up with
by brnt 7y ago
If OTA didn't solve the problem at hand, the solution might be to improve it, rather than abolish it.
One does not need to have more expertise to come up with some sane regulations, i.e. you can't dump trash in the river, a tax filing co. can't lobby for tax legislation.
- jtuente 7y agoImprove it how? The tax filing co isn't the one going to congress, they hire some PR company that does lobbying to talk to congressmen about tax law. Of course, that PR company just so happens to hire people from tax filing co because they know the industry. With OTA, the PR company goes to OTA to talk about tax law, it's just adding a different step to the process.
- brnt 7y agoMaybe the contacts the congressman is allowed to have should be controlled. Why would he ever need to be in touch with a PR firm? PR is the word Bernays invented to avoid using the word propaganda. Why would it be controversial to limit propaganda?
- DataWorker 7y agoIf one does not need expertise then it seems like the OTA would be pointless wouldn’t it? Their purpose was to add expertise but they were technological generalists with a political focus rather than apolitical experts so it’s not clear to me that they added any unique value despite being appealing as a concept.
- anigbrowl 7y agoWhat is wrong with being a generalist? If general perspective weren't important then the military wouldn't have general officers.