It should - not only in all together too familiar rhetoric but because it is so exploitably vague - not only does it not require an actual offense but a reactio

It should - not only in all together too familiar rhetoric but because it is so exploitably vague - not only does it not require an actual offense but a reaction but it is so totalitarian that it easily encompasses a pretense of anything "not obeying" them, let alone dissent including going against their never spoken will. To be frank anyone unironically speaking something like that brings to mind ethical arguements about smothering baby Hitler.