Yes. Which is why the DRM in .EOT was so bizarre. Images are also copyrighted, but no one is adding DRM to them. Even with .OTF, IE only is willing to use the

Yes. Which is why the DRM in .EOT was so bizarre. Images are also copyrighted, but no one is adding DRM to them. Even with .OTF, IE only is willing to use them if they have their "evil bit" set in a particular way. Font companies are desperate to convince everyone they have more copyright than they actually do. > If you take that non-copyrighted rasterized font and produce a vector font from it, I presume that product falls under the original copyright? No, the new product (font file) is copyrighted to you.