The argument is weak, but it's also desperate. These days trying to influence companies often comes down to some argument based on objective costs. "You are mod

The argument is weak, but it's also desperate. These days trying to influence companies often comes down to some argument based on objective costs. "You are modifying my content against my wishes and adding latency to my Internet browsing experience" isn't objective. Personally I think it is morally wrong, and it also is definitely impacting a person's Internet experience. 1/4 of a second is an eternity if you're sensitive to latency. So yeah it is "that bad", it is ugly, it is intrusive, and it speaks volumes about Comcast.