By the way, Bjørn Lomborg is an unreliable and often misleading source. Why? See for yourself multiple examples of quality analysis with actual scientific sourc

By the way, Bjørn Lomborg is an unreliable and often misleading source. Why? See for yourself multiple examples of quality analysis with actual scientific sources. Highly recommended: [1] https://youtu.be/9FQX1u-aqrA https://youtu.be/9FQX1u-aqrA [2] https://youtu.be/hwMPFDqyfrA https://youtu.be/hwMPFDqyfrA And that's analysis of Bjørn Lomborg's work by those who actively support pragmatic, cost-effective, and often 'conservative' solutions to environmental problems and climate change. Examples: [3] https://youtu.be/D99qI42KGB0 https://youtu.be/D99qI42KGB0 [4] https://youtu.be/6fV6eeckxTs https://youtu.be/6fV6eeckxTs