4 ms·
From what I've read, I'm not convinced the company has done enough to earn Francis' loyalty. Francis has already invested ~years of time in this company and th
by yomly 7y ago
From what I've read, I'm not convinced the company has done enough to earn Francis' loyalty.
Francis has already invested ~years of time in this company and they've allowed other toxic people to poopoo his career. Sure they've fired Lee (who clearly needs to go) but Ling has yet to see any consequence, and they've stalled on reevaluating Ling's veto.
In the meantime Francis apparently has to stomach this news and wait til the next promotion cycle in six months, one year? This is Francis' life - why should he waste that opportunity cost when he could be {saving for a house|supporting a family} (or some other life commitment).
This is what you get when everything in your business is a process and dehumanized: to the stakeholders other than Francis, this is a headache - a fire to fight in your business as usual.
To Francis this is trajectory altering, of course he has a right to be furious.
- YayamiOmate 7y agoIt depends what business model and culture you want to nurture. Does enough loyalty stop before stockholm syndrome or even after? Keep in mind that Francis got promotion vetoed against meritorious reason out of spite thanks to collusion of an inept engineer. What loyalty companu showed? Still considering promotion he would have gotten? That is not even amending damage done by politics. Of course you'll get loyalty from inept people, they don't have much else to offer. I am not sure if that's a value you're looking for. You wanna have politicians, you promote loyalty, you wanna have engineers you promote merit and skills.