I hate to say it, and with all respect, but did you read my post at all? Because that's absolutely not what I said. My logic is: 1) The only thing we know abou

I hate to say it, and with all respect, but did you read my post at all? Because that's absolutely not what I said. My logic is: 1) The only thing we know about the guy is that he screwed the client over. The client may or may not have deserved it. Likely deserved it, if you prefer. 2) I don't want to work with him on the chance that the client didn't deserve it, and he'll screw me over when I don't deserve it. Honestly, I don't see what's controversial about that. It's a massive red flag. Of course knowing more about the guy, or his situation, might change my mind. But that's true of any candidate. (Note that I realise he's replied to the thread here now - I'm just trying to explain the thinking in my last post.)