4 ms·
It's not just SV. Power dynamics within orgs have changed and are changing. Traditional Hierarchies are struggling because hyper-connecitivity within the org a
by hos234 7y ago
It's not just SV. Power dynamics within orgs have changed and are changing.
Traditional Hierarchies are struggling because hyper-connecitivity within the org and to the outside world have increased exponentially. This diffuses power at every level within a hierarchy. You can't have power over someone 2 levels down if their network is as influential as your own.
- tenpies 7y agoI don't think we can make that statement yet. What we can say is that there is a huge amount of bloat in current technology companies along with huge perceived competition for employees, so many employees feel they are worth more than they are. Most boom industries go through this. Then you get bad times, the fat gets trimmed, and a couple of lay offs later the employees realize that they are indeed fungible. Add a couple decades of maturity and they get a much more realistic view of work rather than "work is my life, and my life is work". And sure, there may be a handful of essential staff, but the odds that you are a political activist masquerading as an employee while also being essential are nearly zero.
- throw_m239339 7y ago> It's not just SV. Power dynamics within orgs have changed and are changing. I mean, good luck doing that at Oracle or IBM for instance. > You can't have power over someone 2 levels down if their network is as influential as your own. Yes you absolutely can. If the employee refuses to cooperate it's called insubordination and it's ground for firing. Now of course the employee can spin it anyway he wants and use his network of influence to make the employer look bad, but it has limits.