3 ms·
> better to have every body just learn english as their second (computer usage) language Why not Chinese? It would have many advantages: - Text layout would b
by tralarpa 7y ago
> better to have every body just learn english as their second (computer usage) language
Why not Chinese? It would have many advantages:
- Text layout would be much easier (Chinese fonts are mostly mono-space).
- In addition to the first point, Chinese characters can be easily used for vertical text. Looks much nicer in narrow, tall buttons than latin letters.
- Chinese characters are (mostly) pronunciation independent. No they/there/their anymore.
- It has been shown that dyslexic children have less problems recognizing Chinese characters than latin letters.
- Chinese characters are part of the culture heritage of billions of people (both Chinas, Japan, Korea) and not just something they learn at the university.
- Old-school C enthusiasts can now have meaningful variables names while keeping their self-imposed three-character limit (or was it four?)
- Finally, everybody will use wchar_t
- Edit: But there is one disadvantage. There is no Chinese character for "/s" which some people here seem to need
- j-pb 7y agoLogographic writing systems are just a pain in the ass. You have to create huge fonts, you waste ridiculous amounts of space, and you need phonetic descriptions of new words anyways. Like I said, Hawaiian would be cool since it fits inside a nibble with 16 characters, although the words tend to get long.
- K0SM0S 7y agoConsidering how the brain seems to process words when reading ('glancing in context' more than analyzing each letter), I'm pretty sure the length of words does not make reading much longer. Writing is another matter but with auto-predict you could probably shove half the typing off on average. As a software engineer and cousin of Stitch, Hawaiian gets my vote! :handclap:
- munmaek 7y agoA /s is necessary when dealing with the latin alphabet hegemony ;-)