I should've mention beforehead that no indirect victims means that all parties involved are _consent_. Because we live in a world where it is impossible to ful

I should've mention beforehead that no indirect victims means that all parties involved are _consent_. Because we live in a world where it is impossible to fully _not_ affect anyone directly or indirectly, by victims we should understand any party that has an injury caused by our actions and can claim it (but please note again that we expect all the parties involved to be consent) Before folks would diving into the depths of sophism I would suggest to refer to the Wiki article that explains this in better details. Secondarily, appealing to the moral aspect of this problem is meaningless, because again, we are talking about it strictly in a legal sense.