12 ms·
What if it were all true? It would still be a victimless crime. As I understand it, those are secondary effects of what is still a victimless crime. I believe
by mikestew 7y ago
What if it were all true? It would still be a victimless crime.
As I understand it, those are secondary effects of what is still a victimless crime. I believe this also reduces the need for any further what-iffing.
- chasing 7y agowetpaws wrote: "Victimless crime imply that the action would have no direct or indirect victims." I posited some indirect victims. Maybe my point is that reality is way more complex than just "no victim, no crime."