4 ms·
I believe their objection is to spelling conventions, not so much the individual names themselves. Their examples were Ashtin and Tristyn, and if I had to gues
by reificator 7y ago
I believe their objection is to spelling conventions, not so much the individual names themselves.
Their examples were Ashtin and Tristyn, and if I had to guess I don't think they'd object as strongly or at all to Ashton or Tristan.
But that's just my read of their comment.
- thedaemon 7y agoI think this person would prefer the names like Tristan and Tristyn to all be grouped together under 1 Tristan instead of being separate because it is just an alternative spelling just to be different.