3 ms·
Perhaps I'm simply too old, but my first decade of computing was spent using software installed from CD-ROM drives, which you would typically purchase in a bric
by zeta0134 7y ago
Perhaps I'm simply too old, but my first decade of computing was spent using software installed from CD-ROM drives, which you would typically purchase in a brick and mortar store, drive to your house, and install once. We had dial-up at the time, but it was painfully slow and as a kid I wasn't allowed to use it all that often.
HTML help files were the only way I had to really discover the hidden features in any of the software I had. I dove deep into those manuals and read every section, sometimes more than once, just to familiarize myself with what was possible. If I couldn't figure something out, the option to "just Google it" wasn't on the table; the help feature built into the program was the best shot at finding the solution. It was also relatively standard: just about every bit of software, even lots of games, used the same format and had the same basic UI to navigate and search the text.
Maybe times are different now, and internet-based help really is the way to go, but for a long while they were the next best thing to a paper manual: easy to ignore, but incredibly handy when required.
- eps 7y agoFor what it's worth, I grew up on MS-DOS, so I am of comparable age if not older than you. I still stand by my observation - very few people read help _files_. Printed manuals - yes, those were read and they were undoubtedly useful, but not the electronic versions. They are usually bloated with so much filler and so cumbersome to use that people just don't bother.
- sgc 7y agoI have definitely spent plenty of time reading help files as well. Some are very useful, and I would say they are often more useful than a man page just due to the more verbose format.