> Some people consider that, when the rich are hiring a duplicate of a public service, it proves the public service is not fit for purpose. Hire a thousand per

> Some people consider that, when the rich are hiring a duplicate of a public service, it proves the public service is not fit for purpose. Hire a thousand person to just constantly spray water at a single house, I'm pretty sure you'll be able to make sure that house never catch fire, thus is better than any firefighter service. That doesn't means the public service isn't fit for the purpose, they just literally can't do the same. As he said, they mostly do preventive care and not actually fighting fire. The public service does that by education (which make much more sense to me even though it's less effective, but that's just my opinion).