4 ms·

I respect and share your goal to educate users about what they should expect from their browser/computer security-wise. As someone with a (healthy?) distrust o

I respect and share your goal to educate users about what they should expect from their browser/computer security-wise. As someone with a (healthy?) distrust of the content I copy/paste, and would never run code I copy/pasted without checking it first (one of the examples given in the linked bug report thread), I would still rather my browser only copy the text that I visibly highlighted. It is annoying to edit content out that I have carefully selected.

ArchReaper 7y ago
>I would still rather my browser only copy the text that I visibly highlighted. It is annoying to edit content out that I have carefully selected. Absolutely. But how do we solve that problem and still allow proper usage of it? Removing this feature would break the copy ability of nearly every rich-text-like web-based UI in existence, such as Google Sheets. Personally, this feels more like something for an adblock-like addon.
- NoodleIncident 7y ago
  The 10 sites that have a genuine reason to listen to selection events and force you to copy invisible text can ask permission to do so, as suggested in the thread.
  - ArchReaper 7y ago
    That still does not answer the question of "what are we asking permission for?" Why that is a hard question can be understood by reading through the discussions in the OP.
- Marsymars 7y ago
  > Removing this feature would break the copy ability of nearly every rich-text-like web-based UI in existence, such as Google Sheets. Skipping over the technical implementation issues, I'd rather copying rich-text-like be relegated to a "Copy Rich Content" context menu action, and the default copy command be plain text only. I very seldom want to copy rich content. I very frequently am copy/pasting content to notepad, selecting it, and then copying it again in order to strip out the rich content I don't want.

4 ms·

I respect and share your goal to educate users about what they should expect from their browser/computer security-wise. As someone with a (healthy?) distrust o

by uneekname 7y ago

ArchReaper 7y ago
>I would still rather my browser only copy the text that I visibly highlighted. It is annoying to edit content out that I have carefully selected. Absolutely. But how do we solve that problem and still allow proper usage of it? Removing this feature would break the copy ability of nearly every rich-text-like web-based UI in existence, such as Google Sheets. Personally, this feels more like something for an adblock-like addon.
- NoodleIncident 7y ago
  The 10 sites that have a genuine reason to listen to selection events and force you to copy invisible text can ask permission to do so, as suggested in the thread.
  - ArchReaper 7y ago
    That still does not answer the question of "what are we asking permission for?" Why that is a hard question can be understood by reading through the discussions in the OP.
- Marsymars 7y ago
  > Removing this feature would break the copy ability of nearly every rich-text-like web-based UI in existence, such as Google Sheets. Skipping over the technical implementation issues, I'd rather copying rich-text-like be relegated to a "Copy Rich Content" context menu action, and the default copy command be plain text only. I very seldom want to copy rich content. I very frequently am copy/pasting content to notepad, selecting it, and then copying it again in order to strip out the rich content I don't want.