2 ms·
Rebol was closed source back when open source was really starting to take off with Perl and Linux. It is seriously cool (I agree), but the interpreter is a litt
by 7thaccount 7y ago
Rebol was closed source back when open source was really starting to take off with Perl and Linux. It is seriously cool (I agree), but the interpreter is a little slow.
Red still has a little ways to go, but could be a game changer some day. The project is insanely ambitious, but I'm optimistic.
- exikyut 7y agoThe main (IMO sad) reason REBOL sits in a weird half-life position of "not quite dead, but..." is that, while REBOL Core is open, the GUI parts (which are crossplatform, and run on Linux) are still closed source. It's a bit like .NET Core. Great to base a business on... not so great to tinker around with. Arguably the second (tinkering, learning) comes before the first (using what you've learned to build a business). Mildly infuriating...
- draegtun 7y agoJust to clarify it's Rebol 2 (Core/etc) that is closed source. Rebol 3 is open-sourced along with the GUI (R3-GUI).... * https://github.com/rebol/rebol https://github.com/rebol/rebol * https://github.com/metaeducation/ren-c https://github.com/metaeducation/ren-c (community fork) * https://github.com/zsx/r3-gui https://github.com/zsx/r3-gui (Atronix fork)