3 ms·
In Belgium the (ex-)employee needs to be compensated for limiting the employment options. IMO same should apply here. The person is restricted in their employme
by bkor 7y ago
In Belgium the (ex-)employee needs to be compensated for limiting the employment options. IMO same should apply here. The person is restricted in their employment. AWS/Amazon should pay to keep it restricted.
- esturk 7y agoI agree with you, but others often argue that the previous total compensation is what that's for. Said person just haven't worked there long enough to break even should they choose to move to another company in the same industry.
- frogperson 7y agoThis sounds like slavery or indentured servitude, not a free market.
- Ill_ban_myself 7y agoMany AGs in the United States agree and have taken major steps to put into law or set strong precedent that non-competes are exclusive to senior leadership and always come with explicit compensation packages. See NY, CA, MA