2 ms·
Remember me on M$ Frontpage... Had to take over a website made with that in ~ 2007.. Ended up in threwinh it away and rebuilding it myself with (relative) clean
by tlamponi 7y ago
Remember me on M$ Frontpage... Had to take over a website made with that in ~ 2007.. Ended up in threwinh it away and rebuilding it myself with (relative) clean and maintainable HTML/CSS as it was quite simple, and 95% of it was static anyway.
But I understood Frontpage, my aunt used it to create and deploy a website successfully, with nothing more very than basic computer skills, so it had a valid target group.
This, on the other hand, makes one effectively enter the same information in the same way I'd do when just coding it. It fails both, the limited skill-set user class and the advanced, IMO. And, as Flutter already has really hot-reload, good previews, and allows to do such easy widgets in effectively the same way (just drag and drop replace with writing or copy/paste) or maybe even, as of good IDE integration, in a better way, it may also not be useful for "in-between" skilled user groups.
But seems to fit the "Klickibunti" (german for: UX is second class, it just needs to have fancy-looking, effect+color full graphics, for mouse-only interaction) Windows subgroup of users just fine, so maybe I'm just biased.
- mxuribe 7y agoTIL about the word "Klickibunti"! I will now use this in my presentations about awful UI examples! Thanks!