Is it a better match than Pareto? I suspect not: in a 10,000 person org, 100 people are doing half the work. That means the ratio of work between any of those 1

Is it a better match than Pareto? I suspect not: in a 10,000 person org, 100 people are doing half the work. That means the ratio of work between any of those 100 to any of the other 9,900 is 99:1. Unless there's a very interesting definition of "work", that stretches credibility.