4 ms·
Umm... it shows no fires at all. (Edit: tried in both Chrome and Firefox.) In fact the Kincade fire is actively burning and only a few percent contained while
by fernly 7y ago
Umm... it shows no fires at all. (Edit: tried in both Chrome and Firefox.)
In fact the Kincade fire is actively burning and only a few percent contained while 180,000 residents of Sonoma County have been ordered to evacuate.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/10/26/kincade-fire-authorities-bracing-for-dangerous-spread-plead-for-residents-to-evacuate/ https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/10/26/kincade-fire-authorit...
- anigbrowl 7y agoIt's you. I'm using stock Chrome and it works fine, but it takes a minute or two to load as you zoom in.
- adrianmonk 7y agoFYI, I also saw nothing at all, and no indication that anything was still loading, then eventually it loaded.
- kd5bjo 7y agoI got a loading spinner, and then an empty map of CA, and then the data loaded in, in distinct stages. If loading had gotten stuck at the second stage and I didn’t know better, I would have thought that there happen to be no fires at the moment. Normally, I’d just shrug and move on, but in this case the misunderstanding could put people in actual danger. Until the real-time data gets loaded, this should be in some sort of obviously nonfunctional state.
- berkut 7y agoNo fires for me either in Firefox and Chrome on both MacOS and Linux (left the page several minutes).
- mikeryan 7y agoNor the Vallejo fire
- cylinder 7y agoGive it a minute to load. Consider it a throwback to the dial-up era.