3 ms·
Had this been implemented as a web service, half of the crowd would be asking for it to be an open-source program, so they could run it locally, for speed and f
by ken 7y ago
Had this been implemented as a web service, half of the crowd would be asking for it to be an open-source program, so they could run it locally, for speed and flexibility and security. It was implemented as an open-source program, so half of the crowd are asking for it to be a web service for usability and convenience and aesthetics.
What I'm seeing is we've got two big platforms (web, CLI) and they both have some distinct advantages and some distinct disadvantages, and it's not easy for either one to cross the chasm and compete with the other one directly. We desperately need a new platform which combines what we like about both of these, and discards what we don't.
Until then, we're just going to keep implementing all end-user functionality twice, because by historical accident developers do most of their work in a DEC VT100 emulator, and end-users won't tolerate that.
- Xylakant 7y ago> It was implemented as an open-source program, so half of the crowd are asking for it to be a web service for usability and convenience and aesthetics I’ll prefer that any time of day. At least, this way someone can easily turn it into a web service. It generates HTML afaics.
- londons_explore 7y agoA good number of github projects I find say "Install with npm install foo, or try it out online [here]" The online version can host the exact same code from git master. For many projects, no hosting is even required, because the whole thing can run in a codepen-like playground.
- mgartner 7y agoI built it as a CLI because of the reasons you mention, but also because I find that workflow most convenient for me and I didn’t want to need an internet connection.