I see it as one using weasel wording to sound principled while in fact it's not. In particular using "institutions we have elected to do X" instead of just "in

I see it as one using weasel wording to sound principled while in fact it's not. In particular using "institutions we have elected to do X" instead of just "institutions that do X" steps around the question whether the institutions really do X. Which is, incidentally, the major concern of the opponents.