3 ms·
It's not like the approved opinions are going to get censored. Like FB it's a preception managment platform, they dont need to be honest or even pretend to be n
by jakeogh 7y ago
It's not like the approved opinions are going to get censored. Like FB it's a preception managment platform, they dont need to be honest or even pretend to be neutral. The dogma they push will constantly be "not doing enough". The social managment class is more than happy with that situation.
It's a form of Strategy of Tension.
More laws(rules to follow) is not a fix, that's the brier patch. I think many of the problems go back to copyright law if one games it out; limiting exposure to necessary information. Even obtaining news footage archives is difficult. Removing their ability to prevent re-broadcast would fix many things. Tip-toeing around on fair use is a serious limit on critical speech.
- BlueTemplar 7y agoYes, copyright terms should be set to be (as it once was) to be 14 years, renewable against a fee once. > Like FB it's a preception managment platform, they dont need to be honest or even pretend to be neutral. If it's a platform (and platforms, IMHO, go against the very spirit of the Internet), then they should be forced by law to be neutral.