> The models used today have all predicted more warming than actually happened Source? Although all of this depends on what you mean by "more", as in what you

> The models used today have all predicted more warming than actually happened Source? Although all of this depends on what you mean by "more", as in what you assume the error bars on the models are. > temperature data for the past itself has been continuously adjusted Source? > Also note it's impossible for models in the 80's to have been accurate It's not actually. Models don't depend on the temperature. The models could have been (and in fact, were) accurate despite the alleged wrong inputs. > Either the old models are wrong or the old temperature records are wrong, but they can't both be true simultaneously. It doesn't really matter in the context of the legal argument about what Exxon thought to be true in 1982.