Notions of legality are rarely that black and white. It often depends on timing, context and intent. For instance, it is legal to sell a drug that is FDA-appro

Notions of legality are rarely that black and white. It often depends on timing, context and intent. For instance, it is legal to sell a drug that is FDA-approved. But suppose: - It transpires years later that the FDA approval was based in part on the pharma company suppressing unfavourable clinical trial results. - The pharma company claims the FDA was aware (in some sense) of those suppressed studies, and still approved the drug. - A patient dies from adverse reactions observed in one of the suppressed studies. The patient's family is advised to litigate. Who is liable for what here?