3 ms·
. . . it's a long way from testing one component of an engine on the ground to getting a full engine demo going to then testing it in the air to then build the
by goodcanadian 7y ago
. . . it's a long way from testing one component of an engine on the ground to getting a full engine demo going to then testing it in the air to then build the plane then integrating engine . . .
True, but my understanding is that the heat exchanger is the critical piece of difficult technology/engineering. With that, they have the potential to revolutionise industries even if none of the rest comes to pass.
- growlist 7y agoExactly, there is talk of it having significant impact even if it never flies a mile.
- privateSFacct 7y agoPeople gloss over things like building a turbine engine as easy - it is not - it's been done, yes, but for these guys to build, qualify, validate and get an engine flying on passenger planes is a HUGE undertaking even ASSUMING this critical piece of tech was perfect. To also then build the plane? I'm curious to see what their re-entry technology looks like - feels pretty critical path to me. What are these applications and industries that will be revolutionized? I'm serious - I've heard this will revolutionize hypersonic cars. OK. The plane concept itself required a closed loop normal rocket engine - so you've got to have that AND the Sabre AND are doing single stage to orbit. I shudder to think of the mass fractions - how does carrying all this extra around make sense just from the physics - do you save that much in terms of LOX?