3 ms·
> A programming font with cursive italics and ligatures is the worst idea in the world. This is absolutely horrible. BTW, I am really angry. I'm not angry, but
by dvt 7y ago
> A programming font with cursive italics and ligatures is the worst idea in the world. This is absolutely horrible. BTW, I am really angry.
I'm not angry, but I'm pretty sure it's objectively a bad idea. Provably, it's more difficult to read cursive fonts than, say, sans-serif monospace fonts.
Not to mention that the argument that "people like different things" is just not very good. It's simply a bad design choice. Cool project, and the monospace as well as ligatures are awesome, but the cursive italics are most definitely a bust. For context, I've used Fira Code[1] for the past few years and I'm quite happy with it. Author's claim that there aren't any free clean programming fonts is also a bit bizarre; we see free fonts released all the time.
[1] https://github.com/tonsky/FiraCode https://github.com/tonsky/FiraCode
- jjeaff 7y agoFirst of all, readability of something is going to vary person to person. Studies may have found the averages skew toward less readable, but I doubt that applies to 100% of the population. Once you are used to it, it will hardly make a difference. Secondly, it's only objectively bad in your contrived scenario where the only thing taken into account is readability. I have been using a cursive font for terms like "public function" and other oft repeated phrases. The stark difference allows me to more quickly skip over them. I don't need to 'read' them. But my main reason is I just like the style. I stare at code all day long. I want to make it a bit stylistic and fun. Lots of people also have backgrounds on their desktop, but a solid black background would probably be less distracting and make finding icons easier. I also wash and polish my car on occasion, even though leaving it dirty would not affect it's primary purpose, to carry me from point a to point b.