3 ms·
To be completely honest, it's actually an intriguing idea. I wonder, assuming some basic level of competency, if you gave a candidate some completely orthogona
by blazespin 7y ago
To be completely honest, it's actually an intriguing idea. I wonder, assuming some basic level of competency, if you gave a candidate some completely orthogonal task unrelated to the career and they excelled at it (assuming no cheating), would they be a better hire than another candidate?
Maybe! Quite often success at work is determined by getting crap done that doesn't require the skills you trained for initially.
- heavenlyblue 7y agoLet’s take it to another level: the candidate realises that if they kill a current employee with the skills exactly matching theirs, would you hire them (assuming you can’t prove they killed the employee but it’s blatantly obvious) or would you think that’s unacceptable?
- wwweston 7y agoThis would also imply that there's probably fruitful hiring ground in picking from anyone inside your organization (where you have the most direct knowledge) who does their job well, no matter what it is. I'm given to understand companies used to do this.
- Terretta 7y ago> if you gave a candidate some completely orthogonal task unrelated to the career and they excelled at it... would they be a better hire This idea has been tried. It’s called college.
- blazespin 7y agoTrue enough, and it works to a certain degree I think.