3 ms·
No mention of things that have gained a lot of traction, like `ag` and `fzf` ag: - silver searcher, fast parallelized recursive grep that can abide by things l
by fnord77 7y ago
No mention of things that have gained a lot of traction, like `ag` and `fzf`
ag: - silver searcher, fast parallelized recursive grep that can abide by things like `.gitignore`
fzf: - fuzzy finder
powerline-shell - $PS1 on steroids
- grosswait 7y agoI find the to be faster than ag personally
- fnord77 7y agoOn a simple case, `time rg ^:debug ~/projects`, `ag` appears to be about 10% faster for me, which is negligible for most cases anyway. Maybe rg is faster on more complex cases?
- burntsushi 7y agoCan you reproduce it in a public corpus and file a bug report? ripgrep should never be slower than ag.
- epage 7y agoIt does mention rg which is in the same category as ag and, maybe this is my own bias, seems to have more mindshare now.
- ibly31 7y agoAgreed - I used to use Ag but switched to Ripgrep. Better in every single way, in my opinion. It's obscenely fast and has good defaults
- Graziano_M 7y agoripgrep >> ag and skim is a rust clone of fzf