3 ms·
> It's a perfectly fine and useful way to make a cross-platform desktop application. My main problems with Electron are: - The size of the runtime - The fact
by lbeltrame 7y ago
> It's a perfectly fine and useful way to make a cross-platform desktop application.
My main problems with Electron are:
- The size of the runtime
- The fact that every application has to bundle it and it means that multiple Electron applications on the same system do consume a lot of resources if not handled well
- The fact that unless you (as a developer) play due diligence, you might distribute your app with a version of the runtime which may contain vulnerabilities (one of the reasons Linux distributions don't like library bundling that much).
I can't deny it's probably easier for many (not for me, but although I write Python code all day, I'm by no means a "developer"), but it can be potentially wasteful, to say the least, and require far more resources than what you'd actually need with a another toolkit.
That said I for sure won't point a gun at someone who wants to use it. ;)
- Confiks 7y agoThis comment is so beautifully in-character for the thread, and completely fulfills OPs characterization of people that "do indeed seem to spend a disproportionate amount of time bickering about which popular apps best fulfill their purity tests".
- mavhc 7y agoIf they didn't care about software they'd just use whatever came pre installed on their computer
- yjftsjthsd-h 7y agoWe are here because we are deeply interested the software that we're using. If one group of programs does something that tends to suck, then we're going to call it out.
- mantap 7y agoJust remember, you get what you pay for.
- lbeltrame 7y agoTo be honest I spent at best 3 minutes writing that post; compared to the time I put in FOSS projects...