2 ms·
> The C code is simple OO code, but it's OO Pretend "OO" doesn't exist, and OO hasn't been identified. (Say we're in the 70's, that should more or less do it).
by loup-vaillant 16y ago
> The C code is simple OO code, but it's OO
Pretend "OO" doesn't exist, and OO hasn't been identified. (Say we're in the 70's, that should more or less do it). Would you say my C code is procedural? Structured?
> Besides, ALL software engineering terms of significant are ill-defined.
I agree. "OO" just seemed worst.
> I would also agree that the term OO has been […] defined as good design in some circles
Excellent point. That's one thing that pissed me off, actually. I probably should add a paragraph about that.
- jerf 16y ago"Pretend "OO" doesn't exist, and OO hasn't been identified. (Say we're in the 70's, that should more or less do it). Would you say my C code is procedural? Structured?" Begging the question, no offense. I don't address the other two points because I agree, but I didn't think that should pass in silence. (Though I gotta tell you MVC is in the running for worst-mangled-term too, but I won't push the point.)