4 ms·
And I don't want anyone to be able to "repair" or modify certain classes of hardware that I own (though I do want to be able to have root keys for the software
by xoa 7y ago
And I don't want anyone to be able to "repair" or modify certain classes of hardware that I own (though I do want to be able to have root keys for the software side). I don't see why hackability shouldn't be a feature that people can pay for. I can see a solid argument I could get behind for a very minimal requirement that you may request a device-specific bypass for any cryptographic restrictions. Ie., Apple entangles aspects of the hardware for security, but I'd be fine with requiring them to offer owners at time of purchase the choice to have a root hardware signing key for that device only themselves or not.
But I would strongly oppose anything further than that, such as changes to the physical hardware itself. "It works for the expected lifetime" should be required, but features within that should be up to creators and customers.
- snagglegaggle 7y agoThis doesn't need manufacturer intervention... look at secure boot as it is on x86. You have the option of enrolling your own keys, or not doing it, and can lock down the BIOS. If using a TPM then you get okay assurance that the OS has not been tampered with. Sure, there are exploits for these things, just as there are exploits for iOS.