2 ms·
You come across as somebody who's trying to fallaciously prove how smart they are, so can dismiss any argument you think isn't worthy of your esteemed intellect
by dominicr 7y ago
You come across as somebody who's trying to fallaciously prove how smart they are, so can dismiss any argument you think isn't worthy of your esteemed intellect. It's not a good look. Your username adds to the suspicion that you're just a troll.
If you really want to, compare the past 150 years with the previous 2000: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1401-2 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1401-2
- Entropee 7y agoYou come across as somebody who doesn't have an answer to the actual hard question. Yes - it's faster now than 150 years ago. What should the rate of change be at? What should we be aiming for? Give me a bounded interval.
- dominicr 7y agoThere’s nothing to be gained here so I’ll apply the principle of conservation of energy and move on. When two arseholes blow hard all you get is a smelly room.
- Entropee 7y agoWhat do you expect to gain from somebody who already agrees with you, Mr Obvious? Having the last word was a really poor effort at conserving energy.
- dang 7y agoWe've banned this account for breaking the site guidelines. Creating accounts to do that with will get your main account banned as well, so please don't do that. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- Entropee 7y agoban test Try again?
- Entropee 7y agoSeeming as you clicked the down-vote button and not the 'reply' button, I am going to just assume you don't know... Congratulations. You win the argument, and the internet. Pointing out the problems without offering solutions isn't a very useful thing to do.
- dominicr 7y agoI don’t think I can downvote replies to my own comment on HN. But I’ll take the internet crown anyway, thank you! Edit: just tried it, I can downvote your original comment but not your replies to mine.