4 ms·

1. I added a link to the gp - I'll also provide you with these as food for thought: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778 https://www.bbc.com/n

1. I added a link to the gp - I'll also provide you with these as food for thought: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778 https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2013/oct/04/open-access-journals-fake-paper https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2013/oc... 2. Please provide any evidence that I made claims that the greehouse effect doesn't exist.

scottmcf 7y ago
So, no evidence of your claims, gotcha.
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
vkou 7y ago
> 2. Please provide any evidence that I made claims that the greehouse effect doesn't exist. Okay, so it does exist - that's great! We're ~1.3C above the pre-industrial average today. Which part of this 1.3C came from the greenhouse effect, which part of it comes from a collection of odd one-off factors, and which part of it came from the magical IPCC-ignored radiation spectrum that has nothing to do with the greenhouse effect? Please, provide numbers. Not hand-waving - but numbers. Also, since it does exist - how much warming would the greenhouse effect be expected to contribute when we hit 500 ppm carbon? 650 ppm?