There is obviously some attempt to invoke anger here but it's hard for me to understand exactly at what. Another title could have been: Nonprofit sends food gr

There is obviously some attempt to invoke anger here but it's hard for me to understand exactly at what. Another title could have been: Nonprofit sends food growing technology to refugee camp. That's a pretty generous use of the word "used". Should they have intentionally kept silent about the fact that they were actively working with refugee camps until they had peer reviewed proof that it worked? No one here did anything wrong. The technology failed. They will either iterate or decide the idea isn't worth pursuing. No outrage necessary.